Protective Mothers' Alliance International

family court abuse/corruption


with 3 comments

Originally posted on Karen Woodall

As PMA International has posted before, we prefer the term DV by Proxy to explain the manipulations an abuser parent uses to teach the child to reject the protective parent. We prefer this term because;

1. It more accurately depicts the actions taken by the abuser parent towards the child
2. There has been a lot of misinformation about parental alienation circulating the internet and beyond.
3. The term parental alienation and /or parental alienation syndrome has been use as a legal defense for abusive dads in family court. Most often this term has been used by the attorneys of dads who sexual abuse their children. This defense is used – most often- by attorneys in family court for the purpose of deflecting blame from the criminal actions of their client onto the protective mother.
4 The result of the above has frequently been, abusers winning custody due to this misuse of the term.
Because the term is so emotionally charge for protective mothers, and for all the reasons above, we feel DV by Proxy is a better choice. Please keep in mind others still use the term Parental Alienation. Since PMA International did not author this piece, the term parental alienation or alienation may be used.

The truth is that much of the alienated mother shaming that I see happening is perpetuated by those feminist trained professionals who profess to care so much for women. Which is another reason why this group of alienated parents is invisible and unable to share their experience widely. Karen Woodall

It is often said that parental alienation is not a gender issue, by this people mean that the issue can affect either mothers or fathers. At first glance however, it would appear that alienated mothers are in the minority, but in reality they are not so small a group. What faces alienated mothers however is something so deeply unpleasant and so deeply shaming, that it is small wonder that so many women in these circumstances do not reveal to the outside world what has happened to them. Not only do alienated mothers face the loss of their children and all of the grief and suffering that goes with that, they face the hostile and deeply suspicious attitudes of society at large, where the belief that if a mother has lost her children, she must have done something dreadful to deserve it, is an obstinate and poisonous mindset.

This mindset is one that the alienating father is often quick to feed by exploiting the assumptions that other people make about mothers who are not the main carers of their children. Manuvering a child into a position where he is expressing fear of his mother and making allegations about her behaviour towards him, is a key component of the strategy used by alienating fathers. Whilst in this respect it is similar to those which are used by alienating mothers, the alienating father will seek to ensure that the belief structures held by many professionals, about the importance of mothering and its primary function in a child’s life are utilised to the full in the process of convincing the outside world that this mother is not fit to be a mother and this mother has caused her own child to reject her.

On another blog this week I read a comment in which it was asserted that non resident mothers are either drug addicts, alcoholics, prostitutes or dead. I kid you not. In taking this person to task on the matter it became clear that this belief system runs rife even through the mind sets of those who want a more egalitarian way of parenting after separation. When men who seek shared care, loftily and without even blinking, proclaim that non resident mothers are to be thus described, is it any wonder that so many women fight to maintain the role of primary carer after separation and would not choose to share care even if they wanted to? For alienated mothers, exploited, shamed and shoved to the outer margins of our society (as well as their own children’s lives) what hope is there when such horrible attitudes exist?

Screen Shot 2014-09-30 at 8.15.44 PM

Alienated mothers are a group of people for whom there is very little support and very little written which is dedicated to them. In the UK there is one support group called MATCH which is lifeline for women in this situation and whilst Families needs Fathers welcomes mothers as well as fathers this may not be readily apparent to mothers in this situation, (leading me to believe that they really should get their act together and call themselves Families need Mothers AND Fathers).

The truth of the matter is that parental alienation IS a gender issue. It is a gender issue because the experience of being an alienated mother or an alienated father, whilst having much in common internally, in the endless loss and lack of completion of the process of grieving and the sense of helplessness and hopelessness that this brings, is a DIFFERENT experience externally. This difference is caused by the gendered attitudes of the people around us, by the professionals who attempt to assist parents and by the internalised gendered expectations of the parents AND their children. A good mother is ‘supposed’ to be a mother who is eternal and ever present. A good mother is the parent who cares. A good mother is there when her children get home. A mother who is alienated and whose children are making allegations about her being not good, is a mother who faces first the horror of her own alienation and then the horror of other people’s suspicions about why her children have rejected her. The final nail in the coffin of her self confidence and belief is then the disbelief of the professionals around her who, having fallen foul of their own assumptions about good mothers, walk blindly into the trap set by the alienating father in swallowing whole the projection of the mother as the cruel/evil/hopeless/ wrong doer.

This theme is very common in situations where children become alienated from their mothers and whilst many commentators will say that it is also true where children are alienated from their fathers, different attitudes about mothering and fathering, in the professionals around the family, act to create distinctly different outcomes.

For some professionals for example, the thought of a child being alienated from a mother by a father raises the question of whether this is a domestic violence situation in which the father is using the child as a weapon against the mother. In others, the assumption that the child’s rejection is because of something the mother has done, is easier to go with, especially if the father does not readily present as the stereotype of the violent and aggressive man that they expect to see. When a child is alienated against a father by a mother, it is often more readily accepted as being simply the collatoral damage of the separation itself, the assumption being that so long as the child is loved by the mother then that is all that is necessary. In others a child alienated against a father has to have been abused by that man in order for the rejection to have occurred. Some Judges may feel comfortable with the idea of removal of a child from a father, but removal of a child from a mother may be an anethema. Similarly, the alienated mother who faces allegations from her child, may be more suspicious to professionals because her role is to be good and there in her child’s life and if she is not then she cannot deserve the intervention that will change the dynamic. So much depends upon the outside world and the beliefs held about mothers and fathers that the alienating father, alive to the assumptions that other people make, will set up the child to confirm the worst of the negative stereotypes about the not good enough mother.

In many respects this is an issue which should be of deep concern to feminists given their focus on the rights of women and the ways in which they are exploited by men but it isn’t. Alienated mothers seem to face the same kind of dismissal of their reality by feminists as they do by the population at large. In a recent case I was astounded at how social workers who we consider to be working in a feminist industry, swallowed the whole of the tale of a mother who had caused her children to reject her by taking them on holiday to Cornwall instead of the Caribbean. This ‘abusive’ act had even been cited as one of the reasons why the mother was not able to put her children’s needs before her own. The lack of understanding and the complete lack of analysis of why children would use such frivolous reasons for rejecting wholesale a relationship with a mother they had been close to up until only 18 months previously, astonished me. When I questioned them about their understanding of the Duleth Model approach to domestic violence and whether this might just be a case that fitted into this post separation as it likely had prior to it, it was their turn to be astonished. Feminist approaches to post separation support appear to me to rely upon the presence of the stereotyped mother as carer and father as either hopeless and refusing payer of child maintenance or demanding and controlling absent parent. Reverse that dynamic and it is as if the ability to analyse the reality disappears out of the window. The truth is that much of the alienated mother shaming that I see happening is perpetuated by those feminist trained professionals who profess to care so much for women. Which is another reason why this group of alienated parents is invisible and unable to share their experience widely.

Mothers AND fathers are alienated from their children and both suffer immensely. For mothers the loss of the role of carer as well as the loss of the relationship with their children is a burden made heavier by the attitudes of people around them. That is not to say that alienated fathers do not suffer equally, they do and their burdens are made heavier by the attitudes of those around them too, only those attitudes are often different, more dismissive and less caring whilst those facing women are more inquisitive, judgemental and damning.

All of course made so much worse by the very attitudes that poison the world that post separation parenting takes place in. The notion that the only good non resident mother is a dead one, featured strongly this week. It is the other side of the belief that the only good resident father is a widowed one, which is also strong across our society. It speaks of our deeply held societal beliefs about men and women and what they should be doing in the world. It is outdated, it is shaming and it needs to stop. When the only good separated mothers and fathers are those who willingly and co-operatively work together after separation, then we will live in a modern society in which alienation as a crime against children will be recognised and acted upon swiftly and decisively. Until then we must work to eradicate the ignorance that causes the already deeply wounded to suffer even more.

Screen Shot 2014-10-23 at 7.55.44 PM

Written by protectivemothersallianceinternational

October 24, 2014 at 3:29 am

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I think this article is spot on. Mothers who are alienated are looked upon differently to fathers – the fact is both fathers and mothers who are alienated suffer greatly along with their children. I am a mother who is alienated from our son and other people’s perceptions of this, “how can a mother leave her child” etc makes me feel a criminal. I left my husband with the option for my son to come with me, he wanted to stay in the family home and I respected his wishes. This doesn’t mean that I left our son or the terminology used quite frequently in correspondence “abandonment.” Thanks for the post as after reading this I realise that this does happen to women as well as men.


    November 20, 2014 at 4:41 pm

  2. I see a bigger issue here. Let me first say, I’m 52, never married, no kids (that I know of), but I do come from a broken family, at age 12. I was lucky. My parents are smart and mature. They handled their separation professionally by not resorting to maligning one another or by way of us kids. Dad moved out and rented an apartment a few miles away. We (three brothers) remained at home for the time being. We visited him, and he would visit the house regularly and cordially. They kept their cool and didn’t involve us in their snarking on each other, if they ever did. Good for us, right. Well, I think we were fortunate enough to be the offspring of QUALIFIED PARENTS, which meant we weren’t used (abused) by them to facilitate their settlements. They respected us as people and were conscious enough to act like the grown-ups they should be. Here’s the part I don’t get and have a solution to propose. Sometimes, in a society living under the rule of law, one has to prove or show competence to perform a given job or hold a certain title, everything from driver’s licenses to haircuts to therapists, tax prep, doctors, airplane pilots, home-builders, school teachers, child care, etc.. You get where I’m going? Why in the hell don’t we license parents?! They’re essentially unregulated, until the shit hits the fan. I believe anyone considering parenting should be required to get educated on the basics, to be warned what a HUGE RESPONSIBILITY parenting is, to be prepared for the tidal wave that is plopping a child, to be educated on the damaging and unfair circumstances in which kids find themselves BECAUSE THEIR PARENTS SHOULDN’T BE PARENTS. Either due to selfishness, ignorance, ego, laziness, or unmitigated hatred for each other, parents should be held accountable and brought up on legal charges if they attempt to use their kids, or convince the kids to attack or hate the other parent by making false claims. This amounts to similar child abuse, such as pedophilia because it takes advantage of the child’s vulnerability and lack of ability to come to reasonable or critical conclusions. It’s a sick, selfish thing to do to a kid. Talking shit about the other parent to other adults is one thing. They can form conclusions, but not kids. So if parents are first educated, tested, and licensed parents, with continuing education requirements and license renewal, there should be much less abuse of kids and each other by parents. And parents should face legal consequences if they slander or lie about the other, and if they use the kid as a vehicle, additional charges of child abuse should be added on. So if we treat parents like we treat hairstylists, and require them to prove competency to some measure, and they know accountability and consequences will follow if they screw up, a lot of this would go away. Thanks and Good Luck to you all.


    February 11, 2015 at 7:26 pm

    • Hi Dan. Thank you for your comment. We are happy you situation turned out well as many are not so lucky. Your solution is one that many may agree with and yes, it may have some validity in limited situations with healthy adults. But abusers are not healthy adults and they abuse for a few reasons. Most of those reasons have nothing to do with lack of parenting education or skills. Abusers and personality disordered people are very vindictive and get their fix from controlling their target. If the target cannot be controlled anymore because she left him, the abuser will retaliate by destroying her life. This includes damaging or stealing anything important to her, including the children. He will also control her by using the children as his leverage. Narcissists and sociopaths are highly manipulative which makes them hard to spot by even the experienced professional, so innocent, trusting children have no chance in regard to seeing through their lies and games. Family courts are corrupt and will go where the money is so if you have a manipulative , charming, wealthy narcissist father and a wonderful, yet financially middle class mother, guess who gets the children? Sadly these situations are complicated with many issues to address. Best to you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: